<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Pollan is Better Than Berry, and Why Nordhaus and Shellenberger Are The Best</title>
	<atom:link href="http://whippersnapper.wordpress.com/2008/07/11/why-pollan-is-better-than-berry-and-why-nordhaus-and-shellenberger-are-the-best/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://whippersnapper.wordpress.com/2008/07/11/why-pollan-is-better-than-berry-and-why-nordhaus-and-shellenberger-are-the-best/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 04:11:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Throwing Berry out with the Bath Water: The Progressive Backlash against Wendell Berry &#171; Flying Tomato Farms</title>
		<link>http://whippersnapper.wordpress.com/2008/07/11/why-pollan-is-better-than-berry-and-why-nordhaus-and-shellenberger-are-the-best/#comment-7159</link>
		<dc:creator>Throwing Berry out with the Bath Water: The Progressive Backlash against Wendell Berry &#171; Flying Tomato Farms</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 23:23:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whippersnapper.wordpress.com/?p=1427#comment-7159</guid>
		<description>[...] It seems that many so-called &#8220;progressive&#8221; bloggers have seized on this as an opportunity to lambaste Berry as a &#8220;paleoconservative&#8220;&#8211;and dismiss many of his ideas as out-of-touch, and Berry himself as a &#8220;diehard, reactionary traditionalist.&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] It seems that many so-called &#8220;progressive&#8221; bloggers have seized on this as an opportunity to lambaste Berry as a &#8220;paleoconservative&#8220;&#8211;and dismiss many of his ideas as out-of-touch, and Berry himself as a &#8220;diehard, reactionary traditionalist.&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The limits of Berryism &#171; A Thinking Reed</title>
		<link>http://whippersnapper.wordpress.com/2008/07/11/why-pollan-is-better-than-berry-and-why-nordhaus-and-shellenberger-are-the-best/#comment-7155</link>
		<dc:creator>The limits of Berryism &#171; A Thinking Reed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 21:07:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whippersnapper.wordpress.com/?p=1427#comment-7155</guid>
		<description>[...] 13, 2008 by Lee    A couple of liberal bloggers point out, apropos of the AmCon interview with Michael Pollan (see here for my ramblings), that [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 13, 2008 by Lee    A couple of liberal bloggers point out, apropos of the AmCon interview with Michael Pollan (see here for my ramblings), that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Politics of Good Food &#171; Steven White</title>
		<link>http://whippersnapper.wordpress.com/2008/07/11/why-pollan-is-better-than-berry-and-why-nordhaus-and-shellenberger-are-the-best/#comment-7148</link>
		<dc:creator>The Politics of Good Food &#171; Steven White</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 18:35:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whippersnapper.wordpress.com/?p=1427#comment-7148</guid>
		<description>[...] 11, 2008 by stevenwhite    Matt Zeitlin offers a few more good thoughts on politics and food [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 11, 2008 by stevenwhite    Matt Zeitlin offers a few more good thoughts on politics and food [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
