Matt Zeitlin: Impetuous Young Whippersnapper

Lab Grown Meat

with 4 comments

When most people think of lab grown meat, they immediately think “eww.” After all, our meat is supposed to come from healthy, fat, happy, grass fed cows, not some industrial chemical laboratory in New Jersey. The disgust with the prospect of lab grown meat makes sense, until you consider the alternative.

I hardly want to regale everyone with the horror of industrial farming from an ethical perspective so I’ll just leave you be with the fact that animals, especially complex mammals like cows and pigs, can feel pain. I’m not saying that they should have “rights” the same way humans do, but I am saying that there should be some moral consideration for their protection against excessive harm. There are also other significant negative effects of industrial meat production. The animal waste from industrial pig farms poisons water supplies and the air, for just one example of the negative environmental effects of meat. And most importantly, meat production is a meaningful contributor to climate change due to the methane emitted by the livestock themselves, as well as the changes in land-use due to expanding pastures for more animals.

In an ideal world, a carbon tax would make meat more expensive so as to reflect its environmental cost, but that wouldn’t deal with the ethical issue. For that, we would need to see some sort of sea change in either our attitudes towards the morality of industrial farming or some sort of alternative. And hopefully, some day, lab grown meat can be that alternative.

Written by Matt Zeitlin

April 23, 2008 at 10:42 am

Posted in Environment

4 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. As someone who has spent the last six years as a vegetarian for moral reasons, and who really wants to have popcorn chicken again before he dies, I’m pretty psyched about this.

    Dylan Matthews

    April 23, 2008 at 12:05 pm

  2. Daniel Engber disagrees. He think this, like all things PETA does, is just another publicity stunt.

    John Cain

    April 23, 2008 at 6:35 pm

  3. I already read the Engber piece, and he’s 100% right – the chance that this prize will get us economically viable, lab grown meat is just about zero. So yes, this is a huge publicity stunt that won’t work, but it’s also worth pointing out that no prize would probably work. All the other things we have science prizes for – commercially viable space travel, robots on the moon – are things that most people think are really cool, but need an external source of funding for. The problem with lab-grown meat is that most people just think that it’s gross. Now that we at least have PETA putting some publicity behind, maybe some people will change their minds.

    Matt Zeitlin

    April 23, 2008 at 7:28 pm

  4. I guess you’re right, public acceptance of such an idea is still a good in itself. I’m not turning in my PETA-hata badge quite yet, though.

    John Cain

    April 23, 2008 at 7:39 pm


Leave a Reply