Some Experience You Got There
So I’m confused here. On one hand, we’re supposed to give Clinton credit for having eight years of relevant experience in the White House despite the fact that she had no security clearance and the one major policy initiative she was assigned to get through congress, she failed miserably at. Also, we’re supposed to magically associate Clinton with all the good policies her husband put through. But on the other hand, she can tell voters that she opposed NAFTA when it was passed, thus giving her some labor-working class cred. But if she was doing so much in the White House, being so influential and gaining so much experience, then why was NAFTA passed? Some experience you got there…
