<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Increased Wealth, Increased Liberalism and the Slow, Painful Death of Conservatism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://whippersnapper.wordpress.com/2007/05/29/increased-wealth-increased-liberalism-and-the-slow-painful-death-of-conservatism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://whippersnapper.wordpress.com/2007/05/29/increased-wealth-increased-liberalism-and-the-slow-painful-death-of-conservatism/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 04:11:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Trevor</title>
		<link>http://whippersnapper.wordpress.com/2007/05/29/increased-wealth-increased-liberalism-and-the-slow-painful-death-of-conservatism/#comment-77</link>
		<dc:creator>Trevor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 05:28:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whippersnapper.wordpress.com/2007/05/29/increased-wealth-increased-liberalism-and-the-slow-painful-death-of-conservatism/#comment-77</guid>
		<description>That trend holds up for now, and I&#039;d certainly like it to continue to, but I wonder if there aren&#039;t out there already the seeds of a realignment.  Your modern CEO isn&#039;t a terribly reactionary figure - Fortune 500 companies have robust diversity programs, write amici curae on affirmative action cases, and increasingly push for universal healthcare.  Blue-collar workers have red-state values, and buck the elite consensus on immigration and trade.  What&#039;s to stop one party from becoming the sole province of rich polyglot urban elitists and the other of nativist pro-labor conservative christians?  Say, twenty years down the line?

That seems like a much more natural political equilibrium than the one we have now, and one that would probably be ruinously bad for the values we&#039;d choose.

That or another depression, which took the wind out of roaring &#039;20s liberalism for a good long time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That trend holds up for now, and I&#8217;d certainly like it to continue to, but I wonder if there aren&#8217;t out there already the seeds of a realignment.  Your modern CEO isn&#8217;t a terribly reactionary figure &#8211; Fortune 500 companies have robust diversity programs, write amici curae on affirmative action cases, and increasingly push for universal healthcare.  Blue-collar workers have red-state values, and buck the elite consensus on immigration and trade.  What&#8217;s to stop one party from becoming the sole province of rich polyglot urban elitists and the other of nativist pro-labor conservative christians?  Say, twenty years down the line?</p>
<p>That seems like a much more natural political equilibrium than the one we have now, and one that would probably be ruinously bad for the values we&#8217;d choose.</p>
<p>That or another depression, which took the wind out of roaring &#8217;20s liberalism for a good long time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
